Haru Inoue vs Cheong-Eui Kim Head to Head Stats
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W W W W W W W L L
Form
W W W W W W L L L LH2H: Inoue 1 - 0 Kim
They have played 2 sets in total, with Inoue winning 2 and Kim winning 0. The last match between Inoue and Kim was at the M15 Anseong, 30-06-2019, Final, Clay with Haru Inoue getting the victory 6-4 6-0.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Haru Inoue | 1 |
| Cheong-Eui Kim | 0 |
M15 Anseong(30-06-2019)
6
4
6
0
| Inoue | Stats | Kim |
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| Ret. | Ranking | Ret. |
| 800 | Highest Rank | 296 |
| 28 | Age | 35 |
| R | Plays | - |
| 1 | Titles | 13 |
| 62% (43-26) | Career Total W/L | 57% (375-279) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Maneiro VS Frech PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Vukic VS Nishikori PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
23 Apr 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-0 | |||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 4 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 0 |
| 0:0:0 | Average Match Time | 0:0:0 |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 2nd Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Return Points Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Haru Inoue Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats 
Siem Woldeab
Player
Haru Inoue
65%
(
31 of
48)
1st Serve %
66%
(
42 of
64)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
68%
(
21 of
31)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
76%
(
13 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
14 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
32 of
64)
66
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Roberto Cid Subervi
Player
Haru Inoue
68%
(
68 of
100)
1st Serve %
67%
(
62 of
92)
6
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
63%
(
43 of
68)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
36 of
62)
53%
(
17 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
40%
(
40 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
41 of
92)
101
Total Points Won
91
|
6-4 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Haru Inoue
Player
Trent Bryde
64%
(
64 of
100)
1st Serve %
50%
(
47 of
94)
1
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
59%
(
38 of
64)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
37 of
47)
67%
(
24 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
38%
(
38 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
31 of
94)
93
Total Points Won
101
|
1-6 7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Haru Inoue
Player
Justin Roberts
75%
(
55 of
73)
1st Serve %
50%
(
28 of
56)
0
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
65%
(
36 of
55)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
33%
(
6 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
42%
(
31 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
30 of
56)
72
Total Points Won
57
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| F | 6-4 6-0 | H2H | |||
| SF |
Stats
Haru Inoue
Player
Thomas Fancutt
78%
(
62 of
79)
1st Serve %
42%
(
29 of
69)
0
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
3
68%
(
42 of
62)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
22 of
29)
41%
(
7 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
17 of
40)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
38%
(
30 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
30 of
69)
79
Total Points Won
69
|
7-5 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Haru Inoue
Player
Jean Thirouin
66%
(
74 of
112)
1st Serve %
67%
(
68 of
102)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
1
65%
(
48 of
74)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
40 of
68)
37%
(
14 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
13 of
34)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
45%
(
50 of
112)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
49 of
102)
111
Total Points Won
103
|
7-5 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Haru Inoue
Player
Ryota Tanuma
73%
(
37 of
51)
1st Serve %
83%
(
48 of
58)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
0
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
21 of
48)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
35%
(
18 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
33 of
58)
66
Total Points Won
43
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Haru Inoue
Player
Sung Ha Yeon
78%
(
43 of
55)
1st Serve %
44%
(
24 of
54)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
60%
(
26 of
43)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
42%
(
5 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
44%
(
24 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
35 of
54)
66
Total Points Won
43
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ryohei Tagata
Player
Haru Inoue
65%
(
75 of
115)
1st Serve %
65%
(
51 of
79)
9
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
4
67%
(
50 of
75)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
27 of
51)
43%
(
17 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
42%
(
48 of
115)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
35 of
79)
102
Total Points Won
92
|
4-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Cheong-Eui Kim Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Keegan Smith
Player
Cheong-Eui Kim
67%
(
24 of
36)
1st Serve %
31%
(
15 of
48)
8
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
79%
(
19 of
24)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
67%
(
8 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
12 of
33)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
25%
(
9 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
29 of
48)
56
Total Points Won
28
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Steve Johnson
Player
Cheong-Eui Kim
64%
(
39 of
61)
1st Serve %
56%
(
33 of
59)
10
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
1
77%
(
30 of
39)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
34%
(
21 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
30 of
59)
70
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Robert Galloway
Player
Cheong-Eui Kim
49%
(
26 of
53)
1st Serve %
56%
(
34 of
61)
6
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
5
92%
(
24 of
26)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
26%
(
14 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
28 of
61)
67
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| F | 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
| SF |
Stats
Cheong-Eui Kim
Player
Duckhee Lee
63%
(
27 of
43)
1st Serve %
80%
(
48 of
60)
5
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
81%
(
22 of
27)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
22 of
48)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
26%
(
11 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
34 of
60)
66
Total Points Won
37
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Cheong-Eui Kim
Player
Yuta Kawahashi
64%
(
34 of
53)
1st Serve %
53%
(
34 of
64)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
82%
(
28 of
34)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
42%
(
8 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
17 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
29 of
64)
65
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Cheong-Eui Kim
Player
Kazuki Nishiwaki
51%
(
19 of
37)
1st Serve %
44%
(
22 of
50)
5
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
74%
(
14 of
19)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
30%
(
11 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
31 of
50)
57
Total Points Won
30
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Cheong-Eui Kim
Player
Hyeondeok Yoon
62%
(
29 of
47)
1st Serve %
69%
(
34 of
49)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
86%
(
25 of
29)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
30%
(
14 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
27 of
49)
60
Total Points Won
36
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| F | 3-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
| SF |
Stats
Cheong-Eui Kim
Player
Jae Hwan Kim
50%
(
49 of
98)
1st Serve %
58%
(
61 of
106)
7
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
2
92%
(
45 of
49)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
41 of
61)
47%
(
23 of
49)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
25 of
45)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
31%
(
30 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
40 of
106)
108
Total Points Won
96
|
6-7(4) 7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 62% (43/26) | Win/Loss | 57% (375/279) |
| 59% (90/62) | Sets Win/Loss | 56% (832/659) |
| 54% (747/635) | Games Win/Loss | 53% (7377/6566) |
| 59% (22/15) | Hard Win/Loss | 58% (285/208) |
| 73% (19/7) | Clay Win/Loss | 58% (73/53) |
| 33% (2/4) | Indoor Hard W/L | 49% (17/18) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.05 | Aces Per Game | 0.15 |
| 34 | Aces Total | 1048 |
| 0.2 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.1 |
| 137 | Total Double Faults | 649 |
| 1:2:5 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 466.07 | Average Opponent Rank | 527.38 |
| 66% (1715/2612) | 1st Serve % | 65% (14445/22253) |
| 63% (1073/1715) | 1st Serve Win % | 68% (9794/14445) |
| 44% (394/897) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (3899/7808) |
| 50% (149/296) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 45% (1123/2510) |
| 45% (1151/2571) | Return Points Win % | 42% (9571/22577) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Challenger W/L | 41% (57/82) |
| 62% (43/26) | Futures W/L | 62% (318/196) |
| 61% (40/66) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 57% (363/642) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (3/3) |
| 67% (8/12) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 46% (75/163) |
| 60% (9/15) | Deciding Set Win % | 52% (98/189) |
| 95% (38/36) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 86% (355/307) |
| 5% (38/2) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (355/47) |
| 23% (31/7) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 22% (299/67) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
